Time seems to pass faster or slower depending on the language you speak, new research has revealed, because of the way your native tongue speaks about time.
新的研究表明，時(shí)間流逝的快慢取決于你掌握的語(yǔ)言，取決于你的母語(yǔ)描述時(shí)間的方式。
A team from Stellenbosch University in South Africa and the University of Lancaster in the UK say their work also shows how bilingualism encourages the brain to think in new ways.
一個(gè)由南非斯泰倫博斯大學(xué)和英國(guó)蘭開斯特大學(xué)組成的研究團(tuán)隊(duì)稱，他們的研究也揭示了雙語(yǔ)如何使大腦用新的方式思考。
In one experiment, a computer animation of a slowly growing line was shown to 40 Spanish speakers and 40 Swedish speakers. All the animations lasted 3 seconds, but the line didn't always grow to the same length.
在一項(xiàng)實(shí)驗(yàn)中，研究者向40名西班牙語(yǔ)母語(yǔ)者和40名瑞典語(yǔ)母語(yǔ)者展示了一條逐漸變長(zhǎng)的線的電腦動(dòng)畫。所有動(dòng)畫都持續(xù)3秒鐘，但每個(gè)動(dòng)畫中線的長(zhǎng)度不一。
The researchers expected that because Swedes talk about time in terms of distance, they would find it harder to accurately estimate how much time had passed—and they were right.
研究者預(yù)測(cè)，由于瑞典人習(xí)慣用物理距離來(lái)描述時(shí)間，所以他們會(huì)更難估計(jì)過了多長(zhǎng)時(shí)間，實(shí)驗(yàn)證明研究者的預(yù)測(cè)是對(duì)的。
Meanwhile the Spanish speakers, who refer to time in terms of volume (as in a "small" break rather than a "short" break), were much better at realising that the same 3 seconds had elapsed, no matter how far the line grew.
同時(shí)，西班牙母語(yǔ)者是以體積來(lái)描述時(shí)間（休息時(shí)間“小”而非“短”），所以不管動(dòng)畫中的線多長(zhǎng)，他們都能較準(zhǔn)確地感知流逝的時(shí)間大概為3秒。
"The Swedish speakers tend to think that the line that grows longer in distance, takes longer," one of the researchers, linguist Emanuel Bylund from Stellenbosch University explained.
來(lái)自南非斯泰倫博斯大學(xué)的研究者，語(yǔ)言學(xué)家伊曼紐爾?拜蘭德解釋說，“瑞典語(yǔ)母語(yǔ)者認(rèn)為線變得越長(zhǎng)，所需時(shí)間就越多�！�
"Spanish speakers aren't tricked by that. They seem to think that it doesn't matter how much the line grows in distance, it still takes the same time for it to grow."
“西班牙母語(yǔ)者不會(huì)受到線長(zhǎng)短的迷惑。他們認(rèn)為不管線變得有多長(zhǎng)，所需的時(shí)間都是一樣的�！�
In another experiment, participants were shown animations of a jug slowly being filled up: thelength of the animation was fixed, but the jug filled up by different amounts.
另一項(xiàng)實(shí)驗(yàn)中，研究者向參與者展示灌水壺的電腦動(dòng)畫：動(dòng)畫的長(zhǎng)度為定量，但水壺盛水量不同。
Sure enough, this time it was the Spanish speakers who had more trouble estimating thepassage of time.
果然，這次是西班牙母語(yǔ)者估計(jì)時(shí)間時(shí)遇到了困難。
Interestingly, when the spoken prompts in a particular language were taken away, thevolunteers were much better at judging time, as if being asked out loud how much time hadpassed triggered something in the brain.
有趣的是，撤走影響某一語(yǔ)種參與者估計(jì)時(shí)間的道具后，那些受參與者能更準(zhǔn)確地估計(jì)時(shí)間，就好像被大聲問到過了多久時(shí)間激發(fā)了大腦中的某種東西似的。
To gain more insight into what was happening, 74 bilingual speakers of both Spanish andSwedish were also recruited, and shown similar animations.
為了更深入地研究到底是怎么回事，研究者召募了74名西班牙語(yǔ)和瑞典語(yǔ)雙語(yǔ)志愿者進(jìn)行實(shí)驗(yàn)，向他們展示類似的動(dòng)畫。
The end results were the same: when instructed in Swedish, the volunteers were more easilyfooled by the line animations, and when instructed in Spanish, it was the jug animations thatinterfered with their perceptions of time.
最后得到了相同的結(jié)果：用瑞典語(yǔ)發(fā)出指令時(shí)，志愿者們更易被線的動(dòng)畫騙到，用西班牙語(yǔ)發(fā)出指令時(shí)，水壺的動(dòng)畫就會(huì)擾亂他們對(duì)時(shí)間的感知。
